| 髌上入路与髌下入路胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折的比较 |
| Comparison of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approach intramedullary nail techniques in treating distal tibial fractures |
| 投稿时间：2023-07-24 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-5972.2024.02.011 |
| 中文关键词: 胫骨远端骨折 髓内钉 髌上入路 髌下入路 |
| 英文关键词:Distal tibial fracture Intramedullary nail Suprapatellar approach Infrapatellar approach |
| 基金项目:上海市浦东新区临床特色学科（PWYts2021-3） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 242 |
| 全文下载次数: 540 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 研究髌上入路与髌下入路胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年12月上海市浦东新区周浦医院治疗且获随访的85例胫骨远端骨折的患者资料。其中，48例采用髌上入路胫骨髓内钉固定（髌上组），37例采用髌下入路胫骨髓内钉固定（髌下组）。比较两组患者的术后胫骨远端矢状面、冠状面骨折复位和踝关节AOFAS评分。结果 所有患者均获得随访，平均随访时间为（13.5±5.6）个月。髌上组的骨折矢状面成角（4.1°±0.89°）小于髌下组（5.6°±1.25°），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。髌上组冠状面成角（4.2°±0.82°）小于髌下组（5.8°±1.32°），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。髌上组骨折复位不良2例（4.17%），髌下组10例（27.02%），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。髌上组AOFAS评分［（97.3±4.50）分］高于髌下组［（92.0±5.72）分］，踝关节疼痛评分髌上组［（37.3±4.50）分］高于髌下组［（32.0±5.72）分］，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 与髌下入路相比，髌上入路髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折，骨折复位更简单，能获得更好的术后骨折对位和更好的踝关节功能 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To compare the fracture alignment and ankle functional outcomes with intramedullary nails using suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches in treating distal tibial fractures.Methods From January 2020 to December 2021, 85 patients with distal tibial fractures in Shanghai Pudong New District Zhoupu Hospital were analyzed. The suprapatellar approach group included 48 patients who were treated with intramedullary nails using suprapatellar approaches, the infrapatellar approach group included 37 patients who were fixed with intramedullary nails only undergoing traditional infrapatellar approaches. The fracture sagittal and coronal alignment and ankle AOFAS outcomes were emphatically compared.Results All the patients were followed up for an average duration of (13.5±5.6) months. The average sagittal section angle of the fracture in the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approach groups were (4.1°±0.89°) and (5.6°±1.25°), respectively (P<0.05). The average coronal section angle were (4.2°±0.82°) and (5.8°±1.32°), respectively (P<0.05). Two patients (4.17%) in the suprapatellar approach group and 10 patients (27.02%) in the infrapatellar approach group had poor fracture reduction (P<0.05). The average AOFAS were (97.3±4.50) points and (92.0±5.72) points in the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approach groups respectively (P<0.05). The average ankle pain scores were (37.3±4.50) points and (32.0±5.72) points, respectively (P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with infrapatellar approach, the suprapatellar approach can achieve easier fracture reduction, better postoperative fracture alignment, and better ankle function. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
